-
Introduction: A Brave New Networked World: Virtue Ethics And The
Twenty-First Century Manager
Peter L. Cruise, Ph.D. and Pamela T. Brannon, Ph.D., Editors
As twenty-first century public sector managers face
the brave new world of global networks, NPM techniques, and virtual
networked organizations, twentieth-century moral and ethical approaches to
decision making appear inadequate and potentially troublesome. The editors
of this special PAMIJ symposium have selected several articles from the
e-journal Global Virtue Ethics Review that highlight the ethical
difficulties present in this new world, and offer opportunities and
palliatives available for public sector managers as they enter this new and
uncharted venue.
-
Applying Spiritual Wisdom
Thomas D. Lynch and Cynthia E. Lynch
There is a body of literature that cuts across all
religious traditions called "spiritual wisdom." For those in
public administration, this literature is especially helpful to make
more informed decisions on values and ethical choices at the individual
and group levels. In this globalized world where information related
technology is rapidly changing society, secular thinking found in
governmental and educational settings as well as the thinking of
religious institutions are fundamentally inadequate in confronting our
most fundamental public administration problems and difficulties. The
former has stripped out of itself the wisdom of the ages and the latter
seeks too often to advance its own interests rather than those of
society as a whole. This article argues that we now need to examine the
common spiritual wisdom of all religious traditions to help us confront
and properly deal with our ultimate values and ethical challenges of our
profession.
-
The Provenance And Development Of A Global Ethic
James A. Gazell
The article examines the provenance and development of
a global ethic, which over the last half century has received growing public
attention as its importance has risen. In the Introduction, the phrase
global ethic is defined. The central theme of the study is stated: Movement
toward formulations of a global ethic originated a few years after World War
II largely because of an already widespread concern for human rights.
Further development took place as a consequence of a convergence of four
increasingly strong forces: political, economic, environmental, and
religious. To understand better the concept of a global ethic, the body of
the article first explores five semantic issues regarding its use. Then it
examines each of these four forces. The resulting proposals for a global
ethic reflect a rising global consciousness and an emerging, broad consensus
based on a still abstract, but sometimes concrete, set of precepts derived
from the spirit of a golden rule (doing unto others as they would do unto
you or mutually abstaining from harmful actions). The formulations embrace a
chain of at least seven interlocking precepts: the primacy of human rights,
a predilection toward representative government, a humane economic order,
the maintenance of the planetary ecosystem, non-violent resolutions of
disputes, a futuristic orientation, and the organic development of such an
ethic. Continued progress within these dimensions is expected to yield a
global ethos and eventually a global society broadly united in its adherence
to these values, but still culturally and nationally diverse under this
umbrella.
-
Globalization, Moral Justification, And The Public Service
Charles Garofalo
This article argues that there is a profound
connection between the public service and moral justification. In this age
of globalization, it further argues that public administration would be wise
to build on a global ethic. The author argues against a compartmentalized
perspective on ethics and in favor of a unity perspective as presented in
Garofalo, C. and D. Geuras. 1999. Ethics in the Public Service: The Moral
Mind at Work (Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press).
-
P.A. Eth-Talk: Is It Ethical?
David John Farmer
The study and discussion of ethics in public
administration can be dysfunctional and even harmful without a sophisticated
understanding of the field and ethics. This article stresses that those
engaged in discussing ethics should understand epistemology, focus on the
practical, and be very circumspect about imposing a particular ethical
prescriptive on others.
|